Leaked reports indicate that the Constitutional Protection Office has confirmed the findings regarding the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Exposed AFD Report Unveils Insights from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution Regarding the AfD - Leaked reports indicate that the Constitutional Protection Office has confirmed the findings regarding the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Unfiltered Insights on the AfD: What Germany's Domestic Intelligence Service Has to Say

• ~21 min read

Dive into the controversial world of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as we unveil the findings from Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).

AfD's Right-Wing Extremist Suspicion:The AfD is currently being monitored under stricter judicial oversight as a "suspected case" of right-wing extremism by the BfV. [1] This classification, however, doesn't officially label the party as a "confirmed extremist organization" due to ongoing legal proceedings.

The Road to Classification:On May 2, 2025, the BfV declared the AfD a right-wing extremist organization that poses a threat to Germany's democratic order and constitutional framework. [2][3] This decision was based on an extensive, classified 1,100-page report conducted over three years, which concluded that the AfD is a racist and anti-Muslim organization.

Racist and Xenophobic Attitudes:The party has demonstrated xenophobic stances, particularly discriminatory attitudes against non-ethnic Germans and people with migration backgrounds from Muslim-influenced countries. [2][3]

Exclusionary Policies:The AfD has actively sought to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society, subjecting them to unconstitutional unequal treatment and assigning them a legally devalued status. [2]

Right-Wing Extremist Connections: connections to right-wing extremist actors and groups, as well as public statements by AfD representatives supporting these ideologies. [2]

Undermining Democracy:The BfV's report concludes that the AfD aims to undermine Germany's democratic order by promoting ethnic exclusion and inequality. [2][3]

Leadership's Response:The party's leadership disputes the classification, calling it politically motivated and an infringement on freedom of speech. [2][3]

The Future of the AfD:While the AfD is currently under intensified surveillance as a suspected right-wing extremist organization, the final legal status awaits court decisions amid ongoing lawsuits challenging the BfV's designation. [1]

Members in the Spotlight

• Alice Weidel: anti-Muslim rhetoric and negative statements about Muslims [2][3]
• Tino Chrupalla: labeling politicians from other parties as "traitors to the people" [2]
• Maximilian Krah: accusing the Greens of promoting "ethnic replacement" [2]
• Hannes Gnauck: racist and völkisch statements, including comments about "Syrians," "Afghans," and "population exchange" [2]

Islamophobia and Anti-Muslim Rhetoric:The report includes a section on "Islamophobia," detailing an interview with Alice Weidel on a YouTube channel, in which she made "pauschalizing negative statements about Muslims." [2][3]

The Question of Banning the AfDThe classification of the AfD as a right-wing extremist organization has reignited the debate over banning the party. [4] The new federal government is currently holding back, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz stating that the report from the constitutional protection agency must first be analyzed before any further action can be taken. [4]

Sources[1] Deutsche Welle (2025): Bundesverfassungsschutz untersucht AfD: Neues Monitoring. https://www.dw.com/de/bundesverfassungsschutz-untersucht-afd-neues-monitoring/a-59810070

[2] The Local (2025): German intelligence agency designates AfD as right-wing extremist. https://www.thelocal.de/20250502/german-intelligence-agency-designates-afd-as-right-wing-extremist

[3] The Guardian (2025): German intelligence agency declares AfD a 'rightwing extremist' party, but stops short of ban. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/02/german-intelligence-agency-declares-afd-a-rightwing-extremist-party-but-stops-short-of-ban

[4] Deutsche Welle (2025): German parties appear divided over whether AfD should be banned. https://www.dw.com/en/german-parties-appear-divided-over-whether-afd-should-be-banned/a-60453913

1. The Commission has not yet adopted a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens in the context of the scrutiny and monitoring of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party by Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).
2. The verfassungsschutz report on the AfD confirms the party's connection to right-wing extremist actors and groups, as well as their undermining of Germany's democratic order and constitutional framework.
3. The recent classification of the AfD as unconstitutional has sparked discussions in Germany's politics, with some calling for the party to be banned, while others argue for more policy-and-legislation to counter the party's influence.
4. In the realm of cultural-travel, the AfD's stance on war-and-conflicts and their exclusionary policies towards certain population groups have raised concerns about the potential impact on general-news and crime-and-justice.
5. While the leadership of the AfD has disputed the classification, the evidence summarized in the BfV report suggests that the party's rhetoric frequently promotes racist, xenophobic, and anti-Muslim sentiments, as demonstrated by the statements of members like Alice Weidel, Tino Chrupalla, Maximilian Krah, and Hannes Gnauck.
6. The travel habits and lifestyle choices of the average AfD member may differ significantly from those who support more inclusive and diverse policies, potentially dividing German society along ideological lines.
7. As the court decisions on the final legal status of the AfD approach, the broader implications for German politics, as well as the protection of workers from carcinogens, remain to be seen.

Read also: